Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tinana vs Yengarie.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Tinana scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Yengarie (948) sits above Tinana (942). Yengarie skews owner-occupied (92%), Tinana runs more rental-dense (81% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Yengarie edges out on average school ICSEA (948 vs 942).

Common questionsTinana vs Yengarie

Common questions

Does Tinana or Yengarie have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Yengarie scores 948 vs 942 in Tinana. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Tinana or Yengarie?

Tinana scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Tinana
Metric
Yengarie

Price & Market

$560,000
Median house
$182,160
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$520/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
81.0%
Owner occupied
92.0%
16.0%
Renter occupied
3.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
0
5,872
Population
615
49
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
6
942
Avg ICSEA
948

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).