Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tolland vs Turvey Park.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Turvey Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Turvey Park scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Turvey Park skews owner-occupied (69%), Tolland runs more rental-dense (54% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsTolland vs Turvey Park

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Tolland or Turvey Park?

Turvey Park scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Tolland
Metric
Turvey Park

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$220/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$338/wk
54.0%
Owner occupied
69.0%
43.0%
Renter occupied
29.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
2
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
3,459
Population
3,572
34
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
947
Avg ICSEA
947

Climate

585 mm
Annual rainfall
585 mm
31.1°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.1°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).