Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tonebridge vs Frankland River.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Frankland River skews owner-occupied (56%), Tonebridge runs more rental-dense (44% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Tonebridge has a heavier family-household mix (100% vs 60%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Tonebridge
Metric
Frankland River

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$218/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$155/wk
$185/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$155/wk
44.0%
Owner occupied
56.0%
Renter occupied
22.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
20
Population
353
43
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
1
964
Avg ICSEA
964

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).