Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tuckerang vs Kogan.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kogan edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kogan (924) sits above Tuckerang (915). Kogan skews owner-occupied (81%), Tuckerang runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kogan edges out on average school ICSEA (924 vs 915).

Common questionsTuckerang vs Kogan

Common questions

Does Tuckerang or Kogan have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kogan scores 924 vs 915 in Tuckerang. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Tuckerang
Metric
Kogan

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$150/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$210/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$240/wk
63.0%
Owner occupied
81.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied
13.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
111
Population
211
40
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
9
915
Avg ICSEA
924

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).