Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tunnack vs Rhyndaston.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Rhyndaston edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Rhyndaston (923) sits above Tunnack (901). Rhyndaston skews owner-occupied (91%), Tunnack runs more rental-dense (80% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Rhyndaston edges out on average school ICSEA (923 vs 901).

Common questionsTunnack vs Rhyndaston

Common questions

Does Tunnack or Rhyndaston have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Rhyndaston scores 923 vs 901 in Tunnack. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Tunnack
Metric
Rhyndaston

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$188/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$188/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$280/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
91.0%
16.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
212
Population
73
46
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
2
901
Avg ICSEA
923

Climate

586 mm
Annual rainfall
586 mm
21.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
21.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).