Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ullswater vs Ozenkadnook.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ullswater edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ullswater (1002) sits above Ozenkadnook (975). Ullswater skews owner-occupied (80%), Ozenkadnook runs more rental-dense (45% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ullswater edges out on average school ICSEA (1002 vs 975). Ozenkadnook also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 70%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsUllswater vs Ozenkadnook

Common questions

Does Ullswater or Ozenkadnook have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ullswater scores 1002 vs 975 in Ozenkadnook. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Ullswater
Metric
Ozenkadnook

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$162/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$126/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$140/wk
80.0%
Owner occupied
45.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
47
Population
25
51
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
5
1002
Avg ICSEA
975

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).