Side by sideSuburb comparison

Underbank vs Chichester.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Chichester edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Chichester (950) sits above Underbank (943).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Chichester edges out on average school ICSEA (950 vs 943). Underbank also has a higher family-household share (57% vs 30%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsUnderbank vs Chichester

Common questions

Does Underbank or Chichester have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Chichester scores 950 vs 943 in Underbank. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Underbank
Metric
Chichester

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$268/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$230/wk
Owner occupied
70.0%
43.0%
Renter occupied
30.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
16
Population
25
51
Median age
59

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
14
943
Avg ICSEA
950

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).