Side by sideSuburb comparison

Upper Gundowring vs Mongans Bridge.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mongans Bridge edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mongans Bridge (1021) sits above Upper Gundowring (1017). Upper Gundowring skews owner-occupied (88%), Mongans Bridge runs more rental-dense (48% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mongans Bridge edges out on average school ICSEA (1021 vs 1017). Upper Gundowring also has a higher family-household share (71% vs 52%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsUpper Gundowring vs Mongans Bridge

Common questions

Does Upper Gundowring or Mongans Bridge have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mongans Bridge scores 1021 vs 1017 in Upper Gundowring. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Upper Gundowring
Metric
Mongans Bridge

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$340/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$340/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$260/wk
88.0%
Owner occupied
48.0%
14.0%
Renter occupied
17.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
120
Population
49
46
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
5
1017
Avg ICSEA
1021

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).