Side by sideSuburb comparison

Upper Horton vs Cobbadah.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Upper Horton edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Upper Horton (915) sits above Cobbadah (914). Cobbadah skews owner-occupied (79%), Upper Horton runs more rental-dense (65% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Upper Horton edges out on average school ICSEA (915 vs 914). Upper Horton also has a higher family-household share (86% vs 76%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsUpper Horton vs Cobbadah

Common questions

Does Upper Horton or Cobbadah have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Upper Horton scores 915 vs 914 in Cobbadah. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Upper Horton
Metric
Cobbadah

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$187/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$187/wk
$100/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$75/wk
65.0%
Owner occupied
79.0%
14.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
138
Population
95
48
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
2
915
Avg ICSEA
914

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).