Side by sideSuburb comparison

Upper Pilton vs Hirstglen.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Hirstglen edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Hirstglen (991) sits above Upper Pilton (988). Upper Pilton skews owner-occupied (79%), Hirstglen runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Hirstglen edges out on average school ICSEA (991 vs 988). Upper Pilton also has a higher family-household share (93% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsUpper Pilton vs Hirstglen

Common questions

Does Upper Pilton or Hirstglen have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Hirstglen scores 991 vs 988 in Upper Pilton. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Upper Pilton
Metric
Hirstglen

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$245/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$255/wk
$208/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$365/wk
79.0%
Owner occupied
68.0%
Renter occupied
16.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
80
Population
77
48
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
5
988
Avg ICSEA
991

Climate

Annual rainfall
1068 mm
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).