Side by sideSuburb comparison

Urangeline vs Osborne.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Osborne edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Osborne (937) sits above Urangeline (930).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Osborne edges out on average school ICSEA (937 vs 930).

Common questionsUrangeline vs Osborne

Common questions

Does Urangeline or Osborne have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Osborne scores 937 vs 930 in Urangeline. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Urangeline
Metric
Osborne

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$194/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$194/wk
$165/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$165/wk
92.0%
Owner occupied
93.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
31
Population
32
40
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
3
930
Avg ICSEA
937

Climate

585 mm
Annual rainfall
585 mm
31.1°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.1°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).