Side by sideSuburb comparison

Victory Heights vs Gympie.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Gympie edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Gympie scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 24/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsVictory Heights vs Gympie

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Victory Heights or Gympie?

Gympie scores 24/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Victory Heights
Metric
Gympie

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$550/wk
$251/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$400/wk
Owner occupied
59.0%
Renter occupied
37.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
24
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
55
46,427
Population
11,355
46
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

18
Schools nearby
18
968
Avg ICSEA
968

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).