Side by sideSuburb comparison

Walhallow vs Mount Abundance.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mount Abundance edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Abundance (945) sits above Walhallow (860). Walhallow skews owner-occupied (92%), Mount Abundance runs more rental-dense (64% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Abundance edges out on average school ICSEA (945 vs 860). Mount Abundance also has a higher family-household share (83% vs 46%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWalhallow vs Mount Abundance

Common questions

Does Walhallow or Mount Abundance have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Abundance scores 945 vs 860 in Walhallow. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Walhallow
Metric
Mount Abundance

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$241/wk
92.0%
Owner occupied
64.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
31
Population
178
58
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
2
860
Avg ICSEA
945

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).