Side by sideSuburb comparison

Walkaway vs Greenough.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Greenough edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Greenough (923) sits above Walkaway (921). Greenough skews owner-occupied (87%), Walkaway runs more rental-dense (71% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Greenough edges out on average school ICSEA (923 vs 921). Greenough also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 72%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWalkaway vs Greenough

Common questions

Does Walkaway or Greenough have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Greenough scores 923 vs 921 in Walkaway. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Walkaway
Metric
Greenough

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$235/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$350/wk
71.0%
Owner occupied
87.0%
23.0%
Renter occupied
10.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
222
Population
344
47
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
16
921
Avg ICSEA
923

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).