Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wallaces Creek vs Coochin.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Coochin edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coochin (984) sits above Wallaces Creek (983). Wallaces Creek skews owner-occupied (113%), Coochin runs more rental-dense (81% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Coochin edges out on average school ICSEA (984 vs 983). Coochin also has a higher family-household share (79% vs 65%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWallaces Creek vs Coochin

Common questions

Does Wallaces Creek or Coochin have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coochin scores 984 vs 983 in Wallaces Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Wallaces Creek
Metric
Coochin

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$291/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$291/wk
$380/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
113.0%
Owner occupied
81.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
74
Population
115
50
Median age
54

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
8
983
Avg ICSEA
984

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1304 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
28.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).