Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wami Kata vs Port Augusta.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Wami Kata skews owner-occupied (67%), Port Augusta runs more rental-dense (53% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Port Augusta has a heavier family-household mix (58% vs 33%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Wami Kata
Metric
Port Augusta

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$170/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$194/wk
67.0%
Owner occupied
53.0%
Renter occupied
43.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
19
Population
6,437
31
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
10
845
Avg ICSEA
845

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).