Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wandana vs Yuna.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Wandana edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Wandana (1087) sits above Yuna (991). Wandana skews owner-occupied (100%), Yuna runs more rental-dense (80% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Wandana edges out on average school ICSEA (1087 vs 991). Wandana also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 80%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWandana vs Yuna

Common questions

Does Wandana or Yuna have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Wandana scores 1087 vs 991 in Yuna. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Wandana
Metric
Yuna

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$272/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$272/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
14
Population
43
43
Median age
33

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
2
1087
Avg ICSEA
991

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).