Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wandering vs Hastings.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Wandering edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Wandering (982) sits above Hastings (942). Hastings skews owner-occupied (109%), Wandering runs more rental-dense (77% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Wandering edges out on average school ICSEA (982 vs 942). Wandering also has a higher family-household share (75% vs 55%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWandering vs Hastings

Common questions

Does Wandering or Hastings have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Wandering scores 982 vs 942 in Hastings. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Wandering
Metric
Hastings

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$100/wk
77.0%
Owner occupied
109.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
391
Population
41
50
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
3
982
Avg ICSEA
942

Climate

724 mm
Annual rainfall
31.4°C
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).