Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wanganella vs Stud Park.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Stud Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Stud Park (957) sits above Wanganella (943). Stud Park skews owner-occupied (129%), Wanganella runs more rental-dense (60% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Stud Park edges out on average school ICSEA (957 vs 943). Stud Park also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 55%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWanganella vs Stud Park

Common questions

Does Wanganella or Stud Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Stud Park scores 957 vs 943 in Wanganella. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Wanganella
Metric
Stud Park

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$15/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$195/wk
60.0%
Owner occupied
129.0%
25.0%
Renter occupied
24.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
61
Population
54
41
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
5
943
Avg ICSEA
957

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).