Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ward Hill vs Tickera.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ward Hill edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ward Hill (949) sits above Tickera (939). Tickera skews owner-occupied (93%), Ward Hill runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ward Hill edges out on average school ICSEA (949 vs 939). Tickera also has a higher family-household share (81% vs 67%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWard Hill vs Tickera

Common questions

Does Ward Hill or Tickera have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ward Hill scores 949 vs 939 in Tickera. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Ward Hill
Metric
Tickera

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$225/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$190/wk
$175/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$155/wk
63.0%
Owner occupied
93.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied
10.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
52
Population
194
53
Median age
62

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
3
949
Avg ICSEA
939

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).