Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wardering vs Commodine.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Commodine edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Commodine (950) sits above Wardering (944). Commodine skews owner-occupied (86%), Wardering runs more rental-dense (69% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Commodine edges out on average school ICSEA (950 vs 944). Commodine also has a higher family-household share (71% vs 38%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWardering vs Commodine

Common questions

Does Wardering or Commodine have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Commodine scores 950 vs 944 in Wardering. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Wardering
Metric
Commodine

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$216/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$216/wk
$184/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$184/wk
69.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
26
Population
15
48
Median age
53

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
8
944
Avg ICSEA
950

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).