Side by sideSuburb comparison

Warrabkook vs Mount Napier.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mount Napier edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Napier (990) sits above Warrabkook (978). Mount Napier skews owner-occupied (175%), Warrabkook runs more rental-dense (56% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Napier edges out on average school ICSEA (990 vs 978).

Common questionsWarrabkook vs Mount Napier

Common questions

Does Warrabkook or Mount Napier have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Napier scores 990 vs 978 in Warrabkook. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Warrabkook
Metric
Mount Napier

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$150/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$135/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$170/wk
56.0%
Owner occupied
175.0%
25.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
42
Population
16
42
Median age
31

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
11
978
Avg ICSEA
990

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).