Side by sideSuburb comparison

Waterholes vs Wiseleigh.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Wiseleigh edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Wiseleigh (974) sits above Waterholes (970). Wiseleigh skews owner-occupied (89%), Waterholes runs more rental-dense (36% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Wiseleigh edges out on average school ICSEA (974 vs 970). Wiseleigh also has a higher family-household share (74% vs 21%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWaterholes vs Wiseleigh

Common questions

Does Waterholes or Wiseleigh have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Wiseleigh scores 974 vs 970 in Waterholes. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Waterholes
Metric
Wiseleigh

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$280/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$230/wk
$238/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$245/wk
36.0%
Owner occupied
89.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
45
12
Population
177
60
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
9
970
Avg ICSEA
974

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).