Side by sideSuburb comparison

Waterview Heights vs Waterview.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Waterview edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Waterview (926) sits above Waterview Heights (918). Waterview Heights skews owner-occupied (93%), Waterview runs more rental-dense (47% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Waterview edges out on average school ICSEA (926 vs 918). Waterview Heights also has a higher family-household share (84% vs 35%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWaterview Heights vs Waterview

Common questions

Does Waterview Heights or Waterview have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Waterview scores 926 vs 918 in Waterview Heights. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Waterview Heights
Metric
Waterview

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$245/wk
93.0%
Owner occupied
47.0%
6.0%
Renter occupied
46.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
5
1,364
Population
90
49
Median age
57

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
12
918
Avg ICSEA
926

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).