Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wattening vs Bejoording.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Wattening edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Wattening (965) sits above Bejoording (964). Bejoording skews owner-occupied (91%), Wattening runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Wattening edges out on average school ICSEA (965 vs 964).

Common questionsWattening vs Bejoording

Common questions

Does Wattening or Bejoording have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Wattening scores 965 vs 964 in Bejoording. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Wattening
Metric
Bejoording

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$130/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$280/wk
$450/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$400/wk
63.0%
Owner occupied
91.0%
Renter occupied
7.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
61
Population
157
36
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
2
965
Avg ICSEA
964

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).