Wellington vs Apsley

Wellington scores higher on walkability (96/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Apsley skews owner-occupied (90%), Wellington runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

Buying in Wellington or Apsley?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Wellington? The free selling guide

Wellington and Apsley side by side

MeasureWellingtonApsley
Price and market
Median house$327,500–
Median unit$171,360–
House price change, 12 months+9.2%–
Renting
House rent$450/wk$450/wk
Owner occupied59.0%90.0%
Renter occupied36.0%15.0%
Schools
Schools nearby44
Average ICSEA856856
Lifestyle and people
Walk score960
Transit score100
Bike score450
Population4,096116
Median age4147
Climate
Annual rainfall620 mm619 mm
Mean max, January33.2°C33.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Apsley has a heavier family-household mix (90% vs 60%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Wellington vs Apsley: common questions

Which is more walkable, Wellington or Apsley?

Wellington scores 96/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.