Side by sideSuburb comparison

Werrington vs Claremont Meadows.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Claremont Meadows edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Claremont Meadows (977) sits above Werrington (963). Claremont Meadows skews owner-occupied (77%), Werrington runs more rental-dense (52% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Claremont Meadows edges out on average school ICSEA (977 vs 963). Claremont Meadows also has a higher family-household share (86% vs 70%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWerrington vs Claremont Meadows

Common questions

Does Werrington or Claremont Meadows have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Claremont Meadows scores 977 vs 963 in Werrington. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Werrington
Metric
Claremont Meadows

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$400/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$400/wk
$360/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$430/wk
52.0%
Owner occupied
77.0%
46.0%
Renter occupied
21.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
2
Transit score
0
Bike score
100
5,328
Population
5,177
32
Median age
33

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
963
Avg ICSEA
977

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).