Side by sideSuburb comparison

Westfield vs Camillo.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Westfield edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Westfield scores higher on walkability (10/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsWestfield vs Camillo

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Westfield or Camillo?

Westfield scores 10/100 on walkability vs 8/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Westfield
Metric
Camillo

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$251/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$280/wk
Owner occupied
72.0%
Renter occupied
26.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

10
Walk score
8
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
23,639
Population
4,442
41
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
968
Avg ICSEA
968

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).