White Mountain vs Upper Lockyer

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Upper Lockyer (1022) sits above White Mountain (1012). White Mountain skews owner-occupied (100%), Upper Lockyer runs more rental-dense (89% owner).

Buying in White Mountain or Upper Lockyer?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in White Mountain? The free selling guide

White Mountain and Upper Lockyer side by side

MeasureWhite MountainUpper Lockyer
Renting
Owner occupied100.0%89.0%
Renter occupied–8.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA10121022
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population16542
Median age2340
Climate
Annual rainfall762 mm729 mm
Mean max, January30.9°C31.6°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Upper Lockyer edges out on average school ICSEA (1022 vs 1012).

White Mountain vs Upper Lockyer: common questions

Does White Mountain or Upper Lockyer have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Upper Lockyer scores 1022 vs 1012 in White Mountain. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.