Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wiagdon vs Limekilns.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Wiagdon edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Wiagdon (976) sits above Limekilns (947). Wiagdon skews owner-occupied (129%), Limekilns runs more rental-dense (97% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Wiagdon edges out on average school ICSEA (976 vs 947). Wiagdon also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 79%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWiagdon vs Limekilns

Common questions

Does Wiagdon or Limekilns have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Wiagdon scores 976 vs 947 in Limekilns. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Wiagdon
Metric
Limekilns

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$272/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$215/wk
129.0%
Owner occupied
97.0%
Renter occupied
13.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
35
Population
115
44
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
5
976
Avg ICSEA
947

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).