Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wilsons Pocket vs Neusa Vale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Neusa Vale skews owner-occupied (95%), Wilsons Pocket runs more rental-dense (84% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Neusa Vale has a heavier family-household mix (85% vs 75%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Wilsons Pocket
Metric
Neusa Vale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$303/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$260/wk
84.0%
Owner occupied
95.0%
6.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
191
Population
54
48
Median age
58

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
966
Avg ICSEA
966

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).