Side by sideSuburb comparison

Windeyer vs Queens Pinch.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Queens Pinch edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Queens Pinch (942) sits above Windeyer (931). Windeyer skews owner-occupied (89%), Queens Pinch runs more rental-dense (54% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Queens Pinch edges out on average school ICSEA (942 vs 931). Queens Pinch also has a higher family-household share (69% vs 58%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWindeyer vs Queens Pinch

Common questions

Does Windeyer or Queens Pinch have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Queens Pinch scores 942 vs 931 in Windeyer. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Windeyer
Metric
Queens Pinch

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$360/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$360/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$306/wk
89.0%
Owner occupied
54.0%
5.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
187
Population
44
54
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
5
931
Avg ICSEA
942

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).