Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wollombi vs Paynes Crossing.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Wollombi edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Wollombi (921) sits above Paynes Crossing (913). Paynes Crossing skews owner-occupied (100%), Wollombi runs more rental-dense (86% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Wollombi edges out on average school ICSEA (921 vs 913). Paynes Crossing also has a higher family-household share (84% vs 68%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWollombi vs Paynes Crossing

Common questions

Does Wollombi or Paynes Crossing have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Wollombi scores 921 vs 913 in Paynes Crossing. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Wollombi
Metric
Paynes Crossing

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$330/wk
86.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
7.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
301
Population
50
55
Median age
61

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
6
921
Avg ICSEA
913

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).