Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wongamine vs Mumberkine.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mumberkine edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mumberkine (917) sits above Wongamine (873). Wongamine skews owner-occupied (94%), Mumberkine runs more rental-dense (78% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mumberkine edges out on average school ICSEA (917 vs 873).

Common questionsWongamine vs Mumberkine

Common questions

Does Wongamine or Mumberkine have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mumberkine scores 917 vs 873 in Wongamine. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Wongamine
Metric
Mumberkine

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$280/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$220/wk
94.0%
Owner occupied
78.0%
Renter occupied
30.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
39
Population
57
49
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
10
873
Avg ICSEA
917

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).