Side by sideSuburb comparison

Woodstock West vs Shelbourne.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Shelbourne edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Shelbourne (996) sits above Woodstock West (981). Shelbourne skews owner-occupied (100%), Woodstock West runs more rental-dense (44% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Shelbourne edges out on average school ICSEA (996 vs 981). Shelbourne also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 69%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWoodstock West vs Shelbourne

Common questions

Does Woodstock West or Shelbourne have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Shelbourne scores 996 vs 981 in Woodstock West. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Woodstock West
Metric
Shelbourne

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$268/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$343/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
44.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
31.0%
Renter occupied
2.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
45
Population
423
31
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
16
981
Avg ICSEA
996

Climate

422 mm
Annual rainfall
422 mm
29.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
29.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).