Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wooyung vs Sleepy Hollow.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Wooyung edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Wooyung (1036) sits above Sleepy Hollow (1032). Sleepy Hollow skews owner-occupied (75%), Wooyung runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Wooyung edges out on average school ICSEA (1036 vs 1032).

Common questionsWooyung vs Sleepy Hollow

Common questions

Does Wooyung or Sleepy Hollow have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Wooyung scores 1036 vs 1032 in Sleepy Hollow. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Wooyung
Metric
Sleepy Hollow

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$480/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$480/wk
$315/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$325/wk
50.0%
Owner occupied
75.0%
26.0%
Renter occupied
32.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
139
Population
123
49
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
5
1036
Avg ICSEA
1032

Climate

1304 mm
Annual rainfall
1304 mm
28.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
28.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).