Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wuraming vs Lower Hotham.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lower Hotham edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lower Hotham (982) sits above Wuraming (941).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lower Hotham edges out on average school ICSEA (982 vs 941).

Common questionsWuraming vs Lower Hotham

Common questions

Does Wuraming or Lower Hotham have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lower Hotham scores 982 vs 941 in Wuraming. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Wuraming
Metric
Lower Hotham

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$280/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$280/wk
$238/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$238/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,673
Population
13
42
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
2
941
Avg ICSEA
982

Climate

724 mm
Annual rainfall
724 mm
31.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).