Side by sideSuburb comparison

Yering vs Chirnside Park.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Yering edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Yering (1034) sits above Chirnside Park (1032). Yering skews owner-occupied (103%), Chirnside Park runs more rental-dense (83% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Yering edges out on average school ICSEA (1034 vs 1032). Yering also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 81%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsYering vs Chirnside Park

Common questions

Does Yering or Chirnside Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Yering scores 1034 vs 1032 in Chirnside Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Yering
Metric
Chirnside Park

Price & Market

Median house
$940,000
Median unit
$595,000
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$360/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$443/wk
$306/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$443/wk
103.0%
Owner occupied
83.0%
15.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
15
Bike score
70
138
Population
11,779
44
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1034
Avg ICSEA
1032

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).