Side by sideSuburb comparison

Baan Baa vs Turrawan.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Baan Baa edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Baan Baa (911) sits above Turrawan (894). Turrawan skews owner-occupied (96%), Baan Baa runs more rental-dense (71% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Baan Baa edges out on average school ICSEA (911 vs 894). Turrawan also has a higher family-household share (104% vs 92%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBaan Baa vs Turrawan

Common questions

Does Baan Baa or Turrawan have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Baan Baa scores 911 vs 894 in Turrawan. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Baan Baa
Metric
Turrawan

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$221/wk
71.0%
Owner occupied
96.0%
21.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
Transit score
Bike score
166
Population
83
47
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
4
911
Avg ICSEA
894

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).