Side by sideSuburb comparison

Barmah vs Echuca Village.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Barmah edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Barmah (965) sits above Echuca Village (962). Echuca Village skews owner-occupied (91%), Barmah runs more rental-dense (79% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Barmah edges out on average school ICSEA (965 vs 962). Echuca Village also has a higher family-household share (79% vs 51%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBarmah vs Echuca Village

Common questions

Does Barmah or Echuca Village have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Barmah scores 965 vs 962 in Echuca Village. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Barmah
Metric
Echuca Village

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$177/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$285/wk
$190/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
79.0%
Owner occupied
91.0%
11.0%
Renter occupied
5.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
229
Population
577
56
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
9
965
Avg ICSEA
962

Climate

422 mm
Annual rainfall
422 mm
29.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
29.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).