Side by sideSuburb comparison

Barmah vs Picola.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Picola edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Picola (976) sits above Barmah (965).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Picola edges out on average school ICSEA (976 vs 965). Picola also has a higher family-household share (71% vs 51%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBarmah vs Picola

Common questions

Does Barmah or Picola have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Picola scores 976 vs 965 in Barmah. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Barmah
Metric
Picola

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$177/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$177/wk
$190/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$150/wk
79.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
11.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
229
Population
206
56
Median age
57

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
4
965
Avg ICSEA
976

Climate

422 mm
Annual rainfall
29.8°C
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).