Belmont vs Wandana Heights.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $686,000 and $1,212,000. Belmont edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Belmont (median $686,000) is roughly 43% cheaper to buy into than Wandana Heights ($1,212,000).
Belmont scores higher on walkability (4/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Belmont (1073) sits above Wandana Heights (1062).
For buyers
Belmont is the lower entry point at $686,000 median, 43% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Belmont edges out on average school ICSEA (1073 vs 1062).
Common questions
Is Belmont or Wandana Heights cheaper to buy in?
Belmont has the lower median house price at $686,000, roughly 43% below Wandana Heights ($1,212,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Does Belmont or Wandana Heights have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Belmont scores 1073 vs 1062 in Wandana Heights. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Belmont or Wandana Heights?
Belmont scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Belmont against another suburb