Side by sideSuburb comparison

Black Mountain vs Puddledock.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Puddledock edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Puddledock (958) sits above Black Mountain (946). Puddledock skews owner-occupied (118%), Black Mountain runs more rental-dense (81% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Puddledock edges out on average school ICSEA (958 vs 946).

Common questionsBlack Mountain vs Puddledock

Common questions

Does Black Mountain or Puddledock have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Puddledock scores 958 vs 946 in Black Mountain. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Black Mountain
Metric
Puddledock

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$290/wk
$225/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$220/wk
81.0%
Owner occupied
118.0%
14.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
291
Population
41
47
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
18
946
Avg ICSEA
958

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).