Side by sideSuburb comparison

Blue Bay vs The Entrance.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. The Entrance edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

The Entrance scores higher on walkability (14/100 vs 100/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Blue Bay skews owner-occupied (60%), The Entrance runs more rental-dense (39% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Blue Bay has a heavier family-household mix (60% vs 50%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsBlue Bay vs The Entrance

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Blue Bay or The Entrance?

The Entrance scores 100/100 on walkability vs 14/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Blue Bay
Metric
The Entrance

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$385/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$385/wk
$380/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$360/wk
60.0%
Owner occupied
39.0%
37.0%
Renter occupied
57.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

14
Walk score
100
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
1,060
Population
4,244
52
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
985
Avg ICSEA
985

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).