Side by sideSuburb comparison

Braeside vs Aspendale Gardens.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Aspendale Gardens edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Aspendale Gardens (1092) sits above Braeside (1076). Aspendale Gardens skews owner-occupied (84%), Braeside runs more rental-dense (38% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Aspendale Gardens edges out on average school ICSEA (1092 vs 1076). Aspendale Gardens also has a higher family-household share (83% vs 38%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBraeside vs Aspendale Gardens

Common questions

Does Braeside or Aspendale Gardens have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Aspendale Gardens scores 1092 vs 1076 in Braeside. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Braeside
Metric
Aspendale Gardens

Price & Market

Median house
$1,265,000
Median unit
$348,480
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$421/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$421/wk
$504/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$496/wk
38.0%
Owner occupied
84.0%
31.0%
Renter occupied
10.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
22
Transit score
0
Bike score
100
25
Population
6,427
58
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1076
Avg ICSEA
1092

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).