Side by sideSuburb comparison

Braeside vs Waterways.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Waterways edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Waterways (1077) sits above Braeside (1076). Waterways skews owner-occupied (88%), Braeside runs more rental-dense (38% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Waterways edges out on average school ICSEA (1077 vs 1076). Waterways also has a higher family-household share (93% vs 38%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBraeside vs Waterways

Common questions

Does Braeside or Waterways have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Waterways scores 1077 vs 1076 in Braeside. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Braeside
Metric
Waterways

Price & Market

Median house
$1,635,000
Median unit
$348,480
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$421/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$421/wk
$504/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$623/wk
38.0%
Owner occupied
88.0%
31.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
Transit score
Bike score
25
Population
2,422
58
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1076
Avg ICSEA
1077

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).