Side by sideSuburb comparison

Byaduk vs Byaduk North.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Byaduk edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Byaduk (993) sits above Byaduk North (988). Byaduk skews owner-occupied (93%), Byaduk North runs more rental-dense (80% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Byaduk edges out on average school ICSEA (993 vs 988). Byaduk North also has a higher family-household share (83% vs 65%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsByaduk vs Byaduk North

Common questions

Does Byaduk or Byaduk North have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Byaduk scores 993 vs 988 in Byaduk North. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Byaduk
Metric
Byaduk North

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$236/wk
$110/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$325/wk
93.0%
Owner occupied
80.0%
11.0%
Renter occupied
10.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
129
Population
134
53
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
12
993
Avg ICSEA
988

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).