Side by sideSuburb comparison

Byaduk vs Wallacedale.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Byaduk edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Byaduk (993) sits above Wallacedale (979). Byaduk skews owner-occupied (93%), Wallacedale runs more rental-dense (73% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Byaduk edges out on average school ICSEA (993 vs 979).

Common questionsByaduk vs Wallacedale

Common questions

Does Byaduk or Wallacedale have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Byaduk scores 993 vs 979 in Wallacedale. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Byaduk
Metric
Wallacedale

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$185/wk
$110/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$235/wk
93.0%
Owner occupied
73.0%
11.0%
Renter occupied
12.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
129
Population
94
53
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
17
993
Avg ICSEA
979

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).