Cameron Park vs Seahampton.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $930,000 and $780,000. Cameron Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Seahampton (median $780,000) is roughly 19% cheaper to buy into than Cameron Park ($930,000). Over the past year, Cameron Park (+5.3%) ran 15.4 percentage points ahead of Seahampton (-10.1%) on house-price growth.
Cameron Park scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cameron Park (998) sits above Seahampton (989). Seahampton skews owner-occupied (88%), Cameron Park runs more rental-dense (77% owner).
For buyers
Seahampton is the lower entry point at $780,000 median, 19% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Seahampton delivers the better gross yield (4.62% vs 4.05%), but Cameron Park has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.
For families
Cameron Park edges out on average school ICSEA (998 vs 989). Cameron Park also has a higher family-household share (87% vs 74%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Common questions
Is Cameron Park or Seahampton cheaper to buy in?
Seahampton has the lower median house price at $780,000, roughly 19% below Cameron Park ($930,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Which has stronger property growth, Cameron Park or Seahampton?
Over the past 12 months, Cameron Park grew +5.3% vs -10.1% in Seahampton, a gap of 15.4 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.
Does Cameron Park or Seahampton have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cameron Park scores 998 vs 989 in Seahampton. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Cameron Park or Seahampton?
Cameron Park scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
Which suburb has higher rental yield, Cameron Park or Seahampton?
Gross rental yield on houses is 4.62% in Seahampton vs 4.05% in Cameron Park. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Cameron Park against another suburb