Side by sideSuburb comparison

Chipping Norton vs Warwick Farm.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,472,500 and $1,050,000. Warwick Farm edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Warwick Farm (median $1,050,000) is roughly 40% cheaper to buy into than Chipping Norton ($1,472,500). Over the past year, Warwick Farm (+12.2%) ran 7.4 percentage points ahead of Chipping Norton (+4.8%) on house-price growth.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Chipping Norton (996) sits above Warwick Farm (974). Chipping Norton skews owner-occupied (77%), Warwick Farm runs more rental-dense (27% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Warwick Farm is the lower entry point at $1,050,000 median, 40% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Warwick Farm carries both higher gross yield (3.66% vs 2.61%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Chipping Norton edges out on average school ICSEA (996 vs 974). Chipping Norton also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 58%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsChipping Norton vs Warwick Farm

Common questions

Is Chipping Norton or Warwick Farm cheaper to buy in?

Warwick Farm has the lower median house price at $1,050,000, roughly 40% below Chipping Norton ($1,472,500). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Chipping Norton or Warwick Farm?

Over the past 12 months, Warwick Farm grew +12.2% vs +4.8% in Chipping Norton, a gap of 7.4 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Chipping Norton or Warwick Farm have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Chipping Norton scores 996 vs 974 in Warwick Farm. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Chipping Norton or Warwick Farm?

Gross rental yield on houses is 3.66% in Warwick Farm vs 2.61% in Chipping Norton. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Chipping Norton
Metric
Warwick Farm

Price & Market

$1,472,500
Median house
$1,050,000
$342,720
Median unit
$440,000
+4.8%
Annual growth (house)
+12.2%
Days on market

Rental

$740/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$740/wk
$540/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$540/wk
77.0%
Owner occupied
27.0%
21.0%
Renter occupied
69.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
58
Transit score
20
Bike score
100
9,412
Population
6,135
39
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
996
Avg ICSEA
974

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).